6SIGMA黑带项目.pptx

《6SIGMA黑带项目.pptx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《6SIGMA黑带项目.pptx（131页珍藏版）》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。

1、2023/5/14Six Sigma16Sigma 提高搅拌式水壶直通率实施时间：B B：2023/5/14Six Sigma2定义阶段D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma3 客户对此款搅拌水壶产品需求量大,品质要求严.同行业产品价格竞争剧烈外部环境外部环境搅拌式水壶现时直通率为78.5%客户要求1.产品需求量大(30万/年)2.品质要求严提升直通率提升品质D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC 工程选定背景2023/5/14Six Sigma4工程选定背景内部环境内部环境1.2023年1-4月成品直通率低,为78.5%2.成品合格率低，2023年QA验货

2、合格率为86.2%3.劣质成本高，占销售额的比例大。检查工序水温检测功能检测耐压测试外观检测总装直通率单站直通率88.9%98.6%96.4%92.9%78.5%D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023年1-4月产品直通率 2023/5/14Six Sigma5顾客及CTQ直通率低D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC外部顾客外部顾客销售销售/客服客服要求要求提升产品品质提升产品品质/低廉的价位低廉的价位/较少的维修时机较少的维修时机利益利益获取更大利润获取更大利润/节省维修投入节省维修投入内部顾客内部顾客财务管理中心财务管理中心/成本核算部成本核算部要求要求降低劣质成本降低劣质成本/一

3、次就做好一次就做好利益利益增加利润增加利润 VOCCTQCTQ2023/5/14Six Sigma6工程范围PMC进料成品入仓OQC检验IQC检验总装主要生产过程过程范围D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma7工程范围主要装配流程SIPOC)D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC拆底座装脚垫与绕线盖拆大身上座,装电源线到底座装马达垫装固定板到电机固定电机到大身插插座引线装插座到大身压连接头,装开关焊接引线(一焊接引线(二焊接引线(三固定压线码与PCB板接线扎扎带机身内检吹热缩管找出影响直通率的关键流程装装饰圈2023/5/14Six Sigma8工程范围主要

4、装配流程SIPOC)D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC固定大身上下座拆大杯装手柄盖与水龙头压滚动轴承压轴承到发热盘固定发热盘到大杯固定FUSE与温控器装脚垫压插片到杯座，插杯座引线一插杯座引线二固定杯座装搅拌刀组件上连接头水温测试耐压测试功率测试清洁机身，绕电源线清洁大杯与杯盖外观检查找出影响直通率的关键流程2023/5/14Six Sigma9战略分析n1.高品质生活供给商n2.质量上台阶，管理上层次，满足客户要求n3.经市场为中心，以客户为中心，以技术为中心集团战略提高直通率，既降低了劣质成本，又降低了制造成本，而且提高了产品品质，保证了交期，提高了产品市场竞争力和客户满意度。D DM

5、AICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma10问题综述D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma11总装一车间近期直通率走势图D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC问题综述2023/5/14Six Sigma12Y和缺陷定义 Y =直通率 =Y1*Y2*Y3*Y4 D DMAICMAICMAICMAICY1定义:煲水测试合格率Y2定义:耐压测试合格率Y3定义:功能测试合格率Y4定义:外观检查合格率Y Y的定义的定义缺陷定义缺陷定义2023/5/14Six Sigma13工程目标D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC现状1-5月目标11月7

6、8.5%90%2023/5/14Six Sigma14财务收益预计改善目标计算工式合计(RMB)年度收益(人工费用x50%+装配费用0.53x30%+公共费用0.23x100%x预计订单量300,000 x直接提高直通率10%=(1.49x50%+0.53x30%+0.23x100%)x300,000 x11.5%￥:44365元 投入费用改模费用3000+制作夹具费2000=5000元￥:5000元相关费用1.人工成本：1.49元2.装配成本：0.53元3.公共费用：0.23元财务总收益:￥年度预计收益总值=预期收益-投入费用 =44365-5000 =39365元D DMAICMAICMA

7、ICMAIC无形收益：直通率的提高，同时产能也显著提高，产品品质明显改善，提高了产品的市场竞争力和客户满意度。2023/5/14Six Sigma15工程团队组织Champion X君BB:B君MBB：M君XXXXXXXXX品质监控及检验标准的制定现场作业改善及作业方式标准化，控制文件。FMEA分析，流程改进，工程优化测量系统分析，人员培训方案，实验实施。工程协调跟进及MSA、DOE、各阶段分析品管部ZZZ工程部VVV总装部YYY数据的收集和改善的实施，生产现场的控制D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma16阶段6月定义定义测量测量分析分析改进改进控制控制5

8、月7月11月内容工程进程方案工程建立，完成 定义阶段的9个局部Y确实认，数据收集，MSA现水平分析C&E Matrix,FMEA数据收集，多变量分析主变量确定，方差分析FMEA改善方案作成确立质量改进的持续有效方案，通过实验确认工艺，管理标准化，制造系统内推广提交工程报告D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC10月9月8月5.6-6.45.6-6.46.6-7.66.6-7.67.7-9.107.7-9.109.11-10.159.11-10.1510.16-11.2010.16-11.202023/5/14Six Sigma17沟通方式 时间 地点参加人员 主题周总结会 隔周周五下午 16：

9、00 中试部小组全体成员工作进度汇报阶段总结会各阶段完成时 中试部小组全体成员 各阶段工作总结沟通协调D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma18定义阶段总结n以VOB、VOC导出CTQ，定义Y.n分析内外部环境n找到工程范围n确定工程目标和收益估算n组建工程团队、成员角色分工n制定工程进程方案D DMAICMAICMAICMAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma19测量阶段2023/5/14Six Sigma20YS确实认 顾客CTQ品质投诉，成本增加工程Y：提高直通率计量型数据可操作YS(计量型数据煲水测试合格率、功能测试合格率耐压测试合格率、外观检查

10、合格率D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma21YS确实认Y的问题描述煲水测试 不通电不通电 反转反转 灯不亮灯不亮 不加热不加热 水龙头漏水水龙头漏水 连接头漏水连接头漏水 温度高或低温度高或低 发热盘漏水发热盘漏水 开关不良耐压测试 耐压不良功能测试 INT 杂音 功率高或低外观检查大身刮花杯刮花机身混色丝印不良手柄盖离缝大身错位底座错位机内异物D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma22测量日期：2013.6.12分析人员：A君 B君 Y 的MSA-LQC成品外观判断 测试员测试员 3 3名名;样品样品 101

11、0个个;反复反复 3 3次次样品 标准 测试员A测试员B 测试员C 1OKNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNG2OKNGNGNGOKOKOKNGNGNG3NGOKOKNGOKOKNGNGNGOK4NGOKOKOKOKNGOKOKOKNG5OKOKOKOKNGNGNGNGNGNG6OKNGNGNGNGOKNGNGNGNG7NGOKOKOKOKOKOKNGNGNG8NGOKNGNGOKNGNGOKOKOK9OKNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNG10NGOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKD D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma23LQC成品外观检查MSA结果

12、D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma24Within Appraisers Assessment AgreementAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI1 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)2 10 6 60.00 (26.24,87.84)3 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)#Matched:Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsAppraiser Response Kap

13、pa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)1 NG 0.733333 0.182574 4.01663 0.0000 OK 0.733333 0.182574 4.01663 0.00002 NG 0.466667 0.182574 2.55604 0.0053 OK 0.466667 0.182574 2.55604 0.00533 NG 0.682540 0.182574 3.73842 0.0001 OK 0.682540 0.182574 3.73842 0.0001Kappa值小于0.7,需要改善 每个检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比D D D DMMAICAICAICAICLQ

14、C成品外观检查MSA结果2023/5/14Six Sigma25Each Appraiser vs Standard Assessment AgreementAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI1 10 1 10.00 (0.25,44.50)2 10 1 10.00 (0.25,44.50)3 10 1 10.00 (0.25,44.50)#Matched:Appraisers assessment across trials agrees with the known standard.Assessment DisagreementApprai

15、ser#OK/NG Percent#NG/OK Percent#Mixed Percent1 3 60.00 4 80.00 2 20.002 2 40.00 3 60.00 4 40.003 2 40.00 5 100.00 2 20.00#OK/NG:Assessments across trials=OK/standard=NG.#NG/OK:Assessments across trials=NG/standard=OK.#Mixed:Assessments across trials are not identical.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsAppraiser

16、 Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)1 NG -0.610774 0.182574 -3.34535 0.9996 OK -0.610774 0.182574 -3.34535 0.99962 NG -0.477441 0.182574 -2.61505 0.9955 OK -0.477441 0.182574 -2.61505 0.99553 NG -0.666667 0.182574 -3.65148 0.9999 OK -0.666667 0.182574 -3.65148 0.9999Kappa值小于0.7,需要改善P值大于0.05,说明一致性检验结果不

17、可靠检验错误次数每个检查员检查结果与标准一致性(重复性)百分比D D D DMMAICAICAICAICLQC成品外观检查MSA结果2023/5/14Six Sigma26nBetween Appraisers nAssessment Agreementn#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 10 3 30.00 (6.67,65.25)n#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with each other.nFleiss Kappa StatisticsnResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs

18、0)n NG 0.343891 0.0527046 6.52488 0.0000n OK 0.343891 0.0527046 6.52488 0.0000n All Appraisers vs Standard nAssessment Agreementn#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 10 0 0.00 (0.00,25.89)n#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with the known standard.nFleiss Kappa StatisticsnResponse Kappa SE Kappa

19、 Z P(vs 0)n NG -0.584961 0.105409 -5.54942 1.0000n OK -0.584961 0.105409 -5.54942 1.0000所有检验员检查结果一致性(重复性百分比所有检验员检查结果一致性Kappa小于0.7，需改善所有检验员检查结果与标准一致性百分比所有检验员检查结果与标准一致性Kappa小于0.7，需改善D D D DMMAICAICAICAICLQC成品外观检查MSA结果2023/5/14Six Sigma27样品 标准 测试员A测试员B 测试员C 1OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKNG2NGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGOK3OK

20、OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK4OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK5NGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNG6OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK7OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK8NGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNG9NGOKOKOKNGNGNGOKOKOK10OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKY的MSA-LQC成品功能测试 测试员测试员 3 3名名;样品样品 1010个个;反复反复 3 3次次D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma28LQC成品功能测试MSA结果D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/

21、14Six Sigma29nWithin Appraisers nAssessment AgreementnAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 1 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)n 2 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)n 3 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)n#Matched:Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.nFleiss Kappa StatisticsnAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kapp

22、a Z P(vs 0)n 1 NG 1.00 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000n OK 1.00 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000n 2 NG 1.00 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000n OK 1.00 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000n 3 NG 0.85 0.182574 4.65564 0.0000n OK 0.85 0.182574 4.65564 0.0000Kappa值大于0.7,每个检验员检验结果一致性可以接受P值小于0.05,说明一致性检验结果可靠LQC成品功能测试MSA结果每个检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比D D

23、 D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma30nEach Appraiser vs Standard nAssessment AgreementnAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 1 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)n 2 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)n 3 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)n#Matched:Appraisers assessment across trials agrees with the known standard.nAssess

24、ment DisagreementnAppraiser#OK/NG Percent#NG/OK Percent#Mixed Percentn 1 1 25.00 0 0.00 0 0.00n 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00n 3 1 25.00 0 0.00 1 10.00n#OK/NG:Assessments across trials=OK/standard=NG.n#NG/OK:Assessments across trials=NG/standard=OK.n#Mixed:Assessments across trials are not identical.nFleis

25、s Kappa StatisticsnAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)n 1 NG 0.78022 0.182574 4.27344 0.0000n OK 0.78022 0.182574 4.27344 0.0000n 2 NG 1.00000 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000n OK 1.00000 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000n 3 NG 0.71459 0.182574 3.91398 0.0000n OK 0.71459 0.182574 3.91398 0.0000检验错误次数Kappa值大于0.

26、7,每个检验员检验结果与标准一致性可以接受P值小于0.05,说明检验员检验结果与标准一致性结果可靠 所有检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比D D D DMMAICAICAICAICLQC成品功能测试MSA结果2023/5/14Six Sigma31nBetween Appraisers nAssessment Agreementn#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)n#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with each other.nFleiss Kappa St

27、atisticsnResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)n NG 0.840077 0.0527046 15.9393 0.0000n OK 0.840077 0.0527046 15.9393 0.0000n nAll Appraisers vs Standard nAssessment Agreementn#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)n#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with the known standard.nFlei

28、ss Kappa StatisticsnResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)n NG 0.831604 0.105409 7.88928 0.0000n OK 0.831604 0.105409 7.88928 0.0000nAttribute Agreement Analysis Kappa值大于0.7，说明所有检验员检验结果一致性可靠所有检验员检查结果一致性(重复性百分比所有检验员检查结果与标准一致性百分比Kappa值大于0.7，说明所有检验员检验结果与标准一致性可靠D D D DMMAICAICAICAICLQC成品功能测试MSA结果2023/5/14Six

29、 Sigma32Y的MSA-LQC成品耐压测试 测试员测试员 3 3名名;样品样品 1010个个;反复反复 3 3次次D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma33Y的MSA-LQC成品耐压测试结果D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma34Within Appraisers Assessment AgreementAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI 1 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)2 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)3 10

30、 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)#Matched:Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)1 NG 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 OK 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 2 NG 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 OK 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 3 NG 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 O

31、K 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000Kappa值大于0.9,每个检验员检验结果一致性非常好P值小于0.05,说明一致性检验结果可靠每个检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比D D D DMMAICAICAICAICY的MSA-LQC成品耐压测试结果2023/5/14Six Sigma35Each Appraiser vs Standard Assessment AgreementAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI 1 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)2 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)3

32、 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)#Matched:Appraisers assessment across trials agrees with the known standard.Assessment DisagreementAppraiser#OK/NG Percent#NG/OK Percent#Mixed Percent 1 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00#OK/NG:Assessments across trials=OK/standard=NG.#NG/O

33、K:Assessments across trials=NG/standard=OK.#Mixed:Assessments across trials are not identical.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)1 NG 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 OK 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 2 NG 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 OK 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000 3 NG 1 0.182574 5.47

34、723 0.0000 OK 1 0.182574 5.47723 0.0000所有检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比没有检验错误Kappa值大于0.9,每个检验员检验结果一致性非常好P值小于0.05,说明每个检验员检验结果可靠D D D DMMAICAICAICAICY的MSA-LQC成品耐压测试结果2023/5/14Six Sigma36Between Appraisers Assessment Agreement#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)#Matched:All appraisers asses

35、sments agree with each other.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)NG 1 0.0527046 18.9737 0.0000 OK 1 0.0527046 18.9737 0.0000All Appraisers vs Standard Assessment Agreement#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI 10 10 100.00 (74.11,100.00)#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with th

36、e known standard.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)NG 1 0.105409 9.48683 0.0000 OK 1 0.105409 9.48683 0.0000Kappa值大于0.9，说明所有检验员检验结果一致性非常好所有检验员检查结果一致性(重复性百分比所有检验员检查结果与标准一致性百分比Kappa值大于0.9，说明所有检验员检验结果与标准一致性非常好D D D DMMAICAICAICAICY的MSA-LQC成品耐压测试结果2023/5/14Six Sigma37Y的MSA-LQC成品煲水测

37、试 测试员测试员 3 3名名;样品样品 1010个个;反复反复 3 3次次D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma38Y的MSA-LQC成品煲水测试结果D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma39Within Appraisers Assessment AgreementAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI 1 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)2 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)3 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)#Match

38、ed:Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)1 NG 0.856459 0.182574 4.69102 0.0000 OK 0.856459 0.182574 4.69102 0.0000 2 NG 0.864253 0.182574 4.73371 0.0000 OK 0.864253 0.182574 4.73371 0.0000 3 NG 0.864253 0.182574 4.73371 0.00

39、00 OK 0.864253 0.182574 4.73371 0.0000Kappa值大于0.7,每个检验员检验结果一致性可以接受P值小于0.05,说明检验员检验结果一致性结果可靠每个检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比D D D DMMAICAICAICAICY的MSA-LQC成品煲水测试结果2023/5/14Six Sigma40Each Appraiser vs Standard Assessment AgreementAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI 1 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)2 10 9 90.00 (55

40、.50,99.75)3 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)#Matched:Appraisers assessment across trials agrees with the known standard.Assessment DisagreementAppraiser#OK/NG Percent#NG/OK Percent#Mixed Percent 1 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.00 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.00 3 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.00#OK/NG:Assessments across trials=OK/standa

41、rd=NG.#NG/OK:Assessments across trials=NG/standard=OK.#Mixed:Assessments across trials are not identical.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)1 NG 0.926740 0.182574 5.07596 0.0000 OK 0.926740 0.182574 5.07596 0.0000 2 NG 0.932660 0.182574 5.10839 0.0000 OK 0.932660 0.182

42、574 5.10839 0.0000 3 NG 0.932660 0.182574 5.10839 0.0000 OK 0.932660 0.182574 5.10839 0.0000检验结果本身不一致次数Kappa值大于0.,每个检验员检验结果与标准一致性可以非常好所有检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比P值小于0.05,说明检验员检验结果一致性结果可靠D D D DMMAICAICAICAICY的MSA-LQC成品煲水测试结果2023/5/14Six Sigma41Between Appraisers Assessment Agreement#Inspected#Matched Perce

43、nt 95%CI 10 7 70.00 (34.75,93.33)#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with each other.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)NG 0.862315 0.0527046 16.3613 0.0000 OK 0.862315 0.0527046 16.3613 0.0000 All Appraisers vs Standard Assessment Agreement#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CI

44、 10 7 70.00 (34.75,93.33)#Matched:All appraisers assessments agree with the known standard.Fleiss Kappa StatisticsResponse Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)NG 0.930687 0.105409 8.82927 0.0000 OK 0.930687 0.105409 8.82927 0.0000Kappa值大于0.7，说明所有检验员检验结果一致性可靠Kappa值大于0.9，说明所有检验员检验结果与标准一致性非常好D D D DMMAICAICAICAICY

45、的MSA-LQC成品煲水测试结果2023/5/14Six Sigma421.成品外观检查结果不可以接受，需对检验员进行培训。责任人：XXX、YYY。培训结束后需进行第二次MSA分析。2.成品功能、耐压、煲水测试结果可以信赖。MSA结果分析人员培训D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma43成品外观检查培训D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC培训记录2023/5/14Six Sigma44LQC成品外观检查第二次MSA样品 标准 测试员A测试员B 测试员C 1OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK2NGNGOKNGNGNGNGNGNGNG3OKOKO

46、KOKOKOKOKOKOKOK4NGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNG5OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK6OKOKOKOKOKOKNGOKOKOK7NGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGNG8NGNGNGNGNGNGNGNGOKNG9OKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK10NGNGNGOKNGNGNGNGNGNG 测试员测试员 3 3名同第一次名同第一次;样品样品 1010个个;反复反复 3 3次次D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six Sigma45LQC成品外观检查第二次MSA结果D D D DMMAICAICAICAIC2023/5/14Six S

47、igma46nWithin Appraisers nAssessment AgreementnAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 1 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)n 2 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)n 3 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)n#Matched:Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.nFleiss Kappa StatisticsnAppraiser Response Kappa SE Kappa Z P(vs 0)n

48、1 NG 0.728507 0.182574 3.99020 0.0000n OK 0.728507 0.182574 3.99020 0.0000n 2 NG 0.866071 0.182574 4.74367 0.0000n OK 0.866071 0.182574 4.74367 0.0000n 3 NG 0.866071 0.182574 4.74367 0.0000n OK 0.866071 0.182574 4.74367 0.0000Kappa值大于0.7,每个检验员检验结果一致性可以接受P值小于0.05,说明检验员检验结果一致性结果可靠每个检查员检查结果一致性(重复性)百分比D

49、 D D DMMAICAICAICAICLQC成品外观检查第二次MSA结果2023/5/14Six Sigma47nEach Appraiser vs Standard nAssessment AgreementnAppraiser#Inspected#Matched Percent 95%CIn 1 10 8 80.00 (44.39,97.48)n 2 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)n 3 10 9 90.00 (55.50,99.75)n#Matched:Appraisers assessment across trials agrees with the known

50、standard.nAssessment DisagreementnAppraiser#OK/NG Percent#NG/OK Percent#Mixed Percentn 1 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 20.00n 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.00n 3 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 10.00n#OK/NG:Assessments across trials=OK/standard=NG.n#NG/OK:Assessments across trials=NG/standard=OK.n#Mixed:Assessments across trials are not