《浅析选择供应商的工具.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《浅析选择供应商的工具.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。
1、编号：时间：2021年x月x日书山有路勤为径，学海无涯苦作舟页码：第8页 共8页SELECTION TOOL选择供应商的工具SUPPLIER INFORMATION供应商信息：Supplier name: 供应商名称：Phone: 电话：Fax: 传真：Corporate headquarters address: 总部地址：Supplier web page address: 网址：Contact name/title: 联系人：Phone: 电话：Fax: 传真：Contact address: 联系地址：Contact email: EMAIL：Other important infor
2、mation: 其他重要信息：SQE ANALYSISSQE分析：Weight比重Supplier A供应商ASupplier B供应商BSupplier C供应商CRTS ReadinessSuppliers Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM供应商出货品质水平/DPPMSuppliers Customers Line Reject Rate供应商客户的厂内不良率：Suppliers Customers Field Reject Rate供应商客户的市场不良率：Forecasted LRR Customer预估的客户产线不良率Forecasted IFIR Custome
3、rCUSTOMER的预期初始市场不良率Quality System品质系统：Quality Resources品质资源：TOTAL (weighted)总计100%SQE WORKSHEETSQE工作表：RTS READINESSSCORE: 分数：Detail:How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customers needs?说明： 产品需要多长时间才能成功导入CUSTOME
4、R生产，设计能力是否可以满足CUSTOMER需求？Scoring:1Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible分数： 时间及品质具有高风险性，配合度差2 Represents medium risk to schedule or quality; compatible时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好3 Represents low risk to schedule or quality; compatible时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好4 No risk to schedule or quality; co
5、mpatible时间及品质无风险性，配合度好Comments备注:SUPPLIERS OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL/DPPMSCORE:供应商出货品质等级/DPPMDetail:(Suppliers history)说明 供应商的历史状况Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions. 供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。Scoring
6、:1Supplier does not measure DPPM rate分数： 供应商无法计算出不良率2 Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。3 Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提供改善对策。4
7、 Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs analysis (pareto) and has effective corrective action system供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION: 主要的市场不良资讯：a)Agree to Customers DPPM goals: o Yes, goals are _ o No 是否达到CUSTOMER不良率目标： o是，目标是： o否b)Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals: o Yes (
8、plan attached) o Plan promised by _ 是否有确保达到不良率目标的计划： o是（相关计划） o 计划确定人：Comments备注:SUPPLIERS CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATESSCORE供应商客户的厂内不良率 分数：Detail:(Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)说明： （供应商的历史状况） CUSTOMER 的现行目标Scoring:1Suppliers customers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers curren
9、t goal分数： 供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 Suppliers customers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值，但是小于其2倍3 Suppliers customers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商客户的长期不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标一致4 Suppliers customers LRR is b
10、etter than Customers current goal供应商客户的长期不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值SUPPLIERS CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESSCORE:供应商客户的市场不良率 分数：Detail:(Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)说明： 供应商客户的历史状况 CUSTOMER现行目标Scoring:1Suppliers customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分数： 供应商客户的市场不良率超
11、过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 Suppliers customers FIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greaterCUSTOMER客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标，但低于其2倍3 Suppliers customers FIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商客户的市场不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4 Suppliers customers FIR is better than Custome
12、rs current goal供应商客户的市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值FORECASTED LRR CUSTOMERSCORE:预期的CUSTOMER产线不良率 分数DETAIL:(SUPPLIERS FORECASTED)_ (CUSTOMERS CURRENT GOAL)说明： 供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER的现行目标Scoring:1Suppliers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分数： 供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 Suppliers LRR is greater than C
13、ustomers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其2倍3 Suppliers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商的产线不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4 Suppliers LRR is better than Customers current goal供应商的产线不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值FORECASTED IFIR CUSTOMERSCORE:预期的CUSTOMER早期市场不良率
14、 分数Detail:(Suppliers forecasted)_ (Customers current goal)说明： 供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER的现行目标值Scoring:1Suppliers IFIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分数 供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 Suppliers IFIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低
15、于其2倍3 Suppliers IFIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商的早期市场不良率基本于CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4 Suppliers IFIR is better than Customers current goal供应商的早期市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标QUALITY SYSTEMSCORE:品质系统 分数Detail细则:a) ISO Certification: 1 Yes (circle one: 9001 9002) 0 Noa) ISO认证 b) Customer Quality Sy
16、stems Audit scoring ranges:b) 品质系统稽核得分0Less than 70% (Not Approved)2Between 7089% (Conditionally Approved)4Between 90100% (Approved)QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE:品质资源 分数 Detail细则:The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Qua
17、lity Manager with time to attend to strategic issues. Additionally, Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site. 供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经理参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任命一名JQEScoring:1Inadequate resources 系统不健全2 Quality staff; however, no Quality Manager有品保员工，
18、但没有专职品保经理3 Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager有品保员工和专职品保经理4 Quality Department, Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE有品保员工和专职品保经理，同意任命一名JQELOCAL SUPPORT支持SCORE:Detail:Supplier capability to meet Customers “Supplier Quality Standard”细则： 供应商目前的状况可以满足客户的“SQS”Scoring:1No commitment
19、to support and wont be ready until 3 months after First Customer Ship 第一次客户调查没有达到要求且3个月内都没有完成客户的要求2 Exists but poor execution, or wont be ready until 1 month after FCS 3 客户的要求已经改正但改善效果不好，且客户调查后一个月内都没有达成相关要求4 Exists but not totally meeting expectations, or Supplier can have in place at FCS基本已经满足客户要求或客户调查时能够及时改善5 Already exists and meeting expectations完全满足客户要求第 8 页 共 8 页