《供应商选择调查表.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《供应商选择调查表.pdf（7页珍藏版）》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。
1、SELECTION TOOL 选择供应商的工具SUPPLIER INFORMATION 供应商信息：Supplier name: 供应商名称：Phone: 电话：Fax: 传真：Corporate headquarters address: 总部地址：Supplier web page address: 网址：Contact name/title: 联系人：Phone: 电话：Fax: 传真：Contact address: 联系地址：Contact email: EMAIL ：Other important information: 其他重要信息：SQE ANALYSIS SQE 分析：We
2、ight 比重Supplier A 供应商 A Supplier B 供应商 B Supplier C 供应商 C RTS Readiness Suppliers Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM供应商出货品质水平/DPPM Suppliers Customers Line Reject Rate 供应商客户的厂内不良率：Suppliers Customers Field Reject Rate供应商客户的市场不良率：Forecasted LRR Customer 预估的客户产线不良率Forecasted IFIR Customer CUSTOMER 的预期初始市场不良率
3、Quality System 品质系统：Quality Resources 品质资源：TOTAL (weighted) 总计100% SQE WORKSHEET SQE 工作表：RTS READINESSSCORE: _ 分数：Detail: How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customers needs?说明：产品需要多长时间才能成功导入CUSTOMER 生产，设计能力是否
4、可以满足CUSTOMER 需求？Scoring: 1 Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible 分数：时间及品质具有高风险性，配合度差2Represents medium risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好3Represents low risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好4No risk to schedule or quality; compatible
5、 时间及品质无风险性，配合度好Comments 备注 :_ SUPPLIER S OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL/DPPM SCORE: _ 供应商出货品质等级/DPPM Detail: (Suppliers history)_ 说明供应商的历史状况Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions. 供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。Sc
6、oring: 1 Supplier does not measure DPPM rate 分数：供应商无法计算出不良率2Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action 供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。3Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken 供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提
7、供改善对策。4Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs analysis (pareto) and has effective corrective action system 供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION: 主要的市场不良资讯：a) Agree to Customers DPPM goals: Yes, goals are _ No 是否达到CUSTOMER 不良率目标：是，目标是：否b) Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals: Yes (
8、plan attached) Plan promised by _ 是否有确保达到不良率目标的计划：是（相关计划）计划确定人：Comments 备注 :_ SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATESSCORE _ 供应商客户的厂内不良率分数：Detail: (Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)_ 说明：（供应商的历史状况） CUSTOMER 的现行目标Scoring: 1 Suppliers customers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers cu
9、rrent goal分数：供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER 现行目标值的2 倍2Supplier s customers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER 现行目标值，但是小于其2 倍3Suppliers customers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商客户的长期不良率基本与CUSTOMER 现行目标一致4Suppliers customers L
10、RR is better than Customers current goal供应商客户的长期不良率优于CUSTOMER 现行目标值SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESSCORE: _ 供应商客户的市场不良率分数：Detail: (Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)_ 说明：供应商客户的历史状况 CUSTOMER现行目标Scoring: 1 Suppliers customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分
11、数：供应商客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER 现行目标值的2 倍2Suppliers customers FIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater CUSTOMER 客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER 现行目标，但低于其2 倍3Suppliers customers FIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商客户的市场不良率基本与CUSTOMER 现行目标值一致4Supplierscustomers FIR is be
12、tter than Customers current goal供应商客户的市场不良率优于CUSTOMER 现行目标值FORECASTED LRR CUSTOMER SCORE: _ 预期的CUSTOMER产线不良率分数DETAIL: (SUPPLIERS FORECASTED)_ (CUSTOMERS CURR ENT GOAL) 说明：供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER的现行目标Scoring: 1 Suppliers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分数：供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER 现行目标值的2 倍2Suppli
13、ers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER 的现行目标值，但低于其2 倍3Suppliers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商的产线不良率基本与CUSTOMER 现行目标值一致4Suppliers LRR is better than Customers current goal 供应商的产线不良率优于CUSTOMER 现行目标值FORECASTED IFIR CUST
14、OMER SCORE: _ 预期的CUSTOMER早期市场不良率分数Detail: (Suppliers forecasted)_ (Customers current goal) _ 说明：供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER的现行目标值Scoring: 1 Suppliers IFIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分数供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER 现行目标值的2 倍2Suppliers IFIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times g
15、reater 供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER 的现行目标值，但低于其2 倍3Suppliers IFIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供应商的早期市场不良率基本于CUSTOMER 现行目标值一致4Suppliers IFIR is better than Customers current goal供应商的早期市场不良率优于CUSTOMER 现行目标QUALITY SYSTEM SCORE: _ 品质系统分数Detail 细则 : a) ISO Certification: 1 Yes (circle one: 9
16、001 9002) 0 No a) ISO 认证b)Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges: b) 品质系统稽核得分0 Less than 70% (Not Approved) 2 Between 70 89% (Conditionally Approved) 4 Between 90 100% (Approved) QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE: _ 品质资源分数Detail 细则 : The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate
17、 staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues. Additionally, Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site. 供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经理参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任命一名JQE Scoring: 1 Inadequate reso
18、urces 系统不健全2Quality staff; however, no Quality Manager 有品保员工，但没有专职品保经理3Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager 有品保员工和专职品保经理4Quality Department, Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE 有品保员工和专职品保经理，同意任命一名JQE LOCAL SUPPORT支持SCORE: _ Detail: Supplier capability to meet Customers “Supplie
19、r Quality Standard”细则：供应商目前的状况可以满足客户的“SQS”Scoring: 1 No commitment to support and wont be ready until 3 months after First Customer Ship第一次客户调查没有达到要求且3 个月内都没有完成客户的要求2Exists but poor execution, or wont be ready until 1 month after FCS 3客户的要求已经改正但改善效果不好，且客户调查后一个月内都没有达成相关要求4Exists but not totally meeting expectations, or Supplier can have in place at FCS 基本已经满足客户要求或客户调查时能够及时改善5Already exists and meeting expectations 完全满足客户要求