《GRE作文分数重要吗.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE作文分数重要吗.docx（12页珍藏版）》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。
1、GRE作文分数重要吗 GRE作文成果虽然不计入GRE考试总分，但对于想要申请文科类探讨生专业的考生来说其价值并不容忽视，很多排名靠前的文科类院校和专业都会对GRE写作成果提出单独要求。下面我就和大家共享GRE作文分数重要吗，来观赏一下吧。 GRE作文分数重要吗? 很多人可能都觉得，作文独立计分不算入总分，可能其分数重要性并不是太高。这种想法其实是存在很大错误的，缘由主要有两点： 1. 文科专业重视GRE作文分数 众所周知，GRE考试作为一门探讨生阶段入学的综合实力测试，其考试成果可以用来申请全美各高校校的大部分探讨生专业和项目。理科项目一般不须要作文得分，更看重的是GRE总分和GRE数学部分的
2、成果。而文科项目除了总分和语文部分成果外，对于作文也往往会提出特地的分数要求，在这一点上越是优秀的学校越是明显。而假如考生想要申请的是排名靠前，在TOP20以内的顶尖文科名校，那么GRE作文至少也须要考出4分以上的成果才能过关。依据官方发布的最新数据显示，2022年中国考生的GRE作文平均成果仅为3分，因此大家想要获得优秀文科院校的青睐，就须要在作文方面获得超过大部分考生的平均水准的成果。 2. 作文分数常用于初期筛选申请人 同时，由于目前很多顶级名校的申请人数过多，招生官在初步筛选申请者时，往往会实行先依据GRE得分一刀切的方式，把肯定分数线以下的考生干脆解除。而在剩下的考生中，哪怕你的GR
3、E总分超过别人不少，但假如作文分数偏低，那么你的被录用可能性就会降低。可以说，在GRE总分处于同一水平的状况下，考生GRE作文得分凹凸将成为衡量考生水平的重要参考指标。 GRE写作提分从这些角度入手 因此，GRE考生假如申请的是文科类院校专业，那么作文成果就必需要进行提升，而提分的详细侧重要点可以归纳为以下四个方面： 1. 整体结构 文章的整体结构框架是一篇作文好坏的最重要标准。一般来说，一篇标准的GRE高分作文，根据开头，结尾加上中间三个段落的五段式写法是比较常见的。因此，考生对于一篇文章的写作，至少要列出3个分论点，确保中间三段言之有物，同时开头结尾也须要发挥出各自相应的引导和总结作用。
4、2. 逻辑论证 GRE作文有两篇，而无论是立论文ISSUE还是驳论文ARGUMENT，其本质都属于争论文，因此让文章显得有劝服力就成为了关键所在。无论是让自己的论点能够站得住脚，还是让对方的观点显得错误百出，都须要考生通过逻辑论证来得以实现。因此，逻辑论证的合理性、对观点挖掘的深度，以及分论点之间的的连贯性，都考生须要在写作中体现出来以支撑逻辑论证。 3. 遣词造句 一篇好作文自然离不开词句上的运用。合理正确没有语法错误只能算是达标，想要让GRE作文得到4分以上的评价，考生就须要在达标以上进一步进行遣词造句的优化运用。句式运用上须要多样化，避开简洁句的连续出现，但也不能过度堆砌长难句而让文章显
5、得累赘。词汇运用上不能重复运用相同词汇，要体现出肯定的改变呈现词汇量，但也要确保所用词汇的正确表达，不能为了追求新奇而滥用生僻词汇，也须要避开词汇间错误搭配的问题。 4. 字数篇幅 虽然GRE考试对于作文字数篇幅从来没有提出过明确要求，但依据官方公布的各类高分范文来看，一般来说字数在400-600字是最佳范围。这是因为篇幅过短的文章，简单给考官留下考生写作实力不足，无法表达出自己想法的印象，但篇幅太长同样会给人留下啰嗦累赘的感觉。因此把文章的篇幅字数限制在400-600字是最为合适的做法。 综上所述，哪怕是GRE作文成果不计入总分，大家也不能对作文备考掉以轻心。特殊是对于想要申请文科的考生来说
6、，足够优秀的作文成果才能帮你在达成申请目标胜利拿到OFFER的道路上走得更远。 GRE写作高分范文：竞争利弊问题 题目： "Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society." 归根结底，竞争对于社会是利多弊少。 正文： Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fi
7、ttest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our s
8、urvival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society. First, let us try to identify why there is competit
9、ion in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the q
10、ueue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitar
11、ian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students. Furthermore, competit
12、ion leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outd
13、o each other. Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society. While it is true to say that competition
14、 in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corpora
15、tions in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these
16、multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon. That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced man
17、y corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more
18、. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills. GRE写作高分范文：多媒体教化 GRE写作题目： Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instruct
19、ing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 尽管诸如电视、电脑和互联网这样的独创好像给学校教化供应了进步的手段，但是全部这些技术往往也是在偏离真正的学习。 GRE写作范文： Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learn
20、ing process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on
21、 these innovations themselves. To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic d
22、iscipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words
23、and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the
24、papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process. Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms
25、are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desi
26、res to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. Fro
27、m this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations. In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them.
28、 It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a compute
29、r. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire. GRE作文本文来源：网络收集与整理，如有侵权，请联系作者删除，谢谢！第12页 共12页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页第 12 页 共 12 页