2023年什么是团队合作精神-什么是真正的团队合作.docx

上传人:wj151****6093 文档编号:81525672 上传时间:2023-03-24 格式:DOCX 页数:4 大小:12.19KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2023年什么是团队合作精神-什么是真正的团队合作.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
2023年什么是团队合作精神-什么是真正的团队合作.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2023年什么是团队合作精神-什么是真正的团队合作.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2023年什么是团队合作精神-什么是真正的团队合作.docx(4页珍藏版)》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。

1、2023年什么是团队合作精神|什么是真正的团队合作所谓团队协作能力,是指建立在团队的基础之上,发挥团队精神、互补互助以达到团队最大工作效率的能力。对于团队的成员来说,不仅要有个人能力,更需要有在不同的位置上各尽所能、与其他成员协调合作的能力。Everything You Thought You Knew About Teamwork Is Wrong1) Teams aren’t always a good idea…teams are not automatically better than the sum of their parts. They are oft

2、en worse. This is termed collaborative inhibition or process loss.… People have a bias to romanticize the benefits of team productivity, while underestimating just how much time is wasted by teams. According to University of North Carolina professor Bradley Staats, productivity per person can

3、 drop 40% even on a small team… In studies of thousands of companies that have implemented teamwork, there’s no firm evidence that, on average, they make any more money, or are even more productive, after instituting a team-based structure.2) Ninety percent of team success is determined

4、 before they start work…what Hackman calls the 60/ 30/ 10 Rule. Having studied teams in many settings, from airplane cockpits to symphony orchestras, Hackman believes that 60% of a team’s fate has been written before the team members even meet. Its destiny is decided by a combination of

5、 the team leader’s efficacy, whether the team’s goal is challenging yet attainable, and the ability level of the people recruited to the team. Thirty percent of a team’s fate is sealed with the initial launch of the team how the teammates meet and, in those initial exchanges, how t

6、hey split up the responsibilities and tasks before them. They need to agree on common codes of conduct and shared expectations. All told, 90% of a team’s fate has been decided before the team ever begins its real work.3) Defining roles may be the most important thing a team doesClarifying who

7、is going to do what identifying distinct roles is one of the most proven ways to increase the quality of teamwork. The egalitarian notion that team members should be equal in status and interchangeable in their roles is erroneous. Teams work best when participants know their roles, but not every rol

8、e needs to be equal. Dr. Eduardo Salas, at the University of Central Florida, is one of the most widely cited scholars studying team efficiency. He has devoted his life to understanding the vast sea of team-building and team-training processes analyzing teams used in the military, law enforcement, N

9、ASA, and numerous corporate settings. The only strategies that consistently deliver results are those that focus on role clarification: who’s going to do what when the pressure gets intense.4) Everyone does not need to be a Team PlayerOne fallacy about teams is that, to be successful, everyone

10、 must be friends. The research says it’s the other way around: team performance drives the quality of relationships… There is an argument to be made that not everyone on a team should be a classic team player. In a study of 78 European and American orchestras, Harvard’s Hackman ar

11、rived at a counterintuitive conclusion: the better an orchestra sounded, the more likely there was rivalry, quarreling, and discord behind the scenes. The only times they were in harmony was onstage.5) Yes, you should treat stars differentlyDoesn’t giving stars special treatment undermine the

12、motivation of the rest of the team? Researchers have looked at the pay of NBA stars, compared with that of their lesser-famous teammates. On average, if certain teammates are getting what is perceived to be an unjustified windfall, that hurts performance: team members won’t work as hard to grab what they see as the short end of the stick. But as long the star treatment is warranted, it doesn’t hurt performance… Stars aren’t the same. Stars face elevated levels of scrutiny: the expectations for their performances are much higher.

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 应用文书 > 工作报告

本站为文档C TO C交易模式,本站只提供存储空间、用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。本站仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁网,我们立即给予删除!客服QQ:136780468 微信:18945177775 电话:18904686070

工信部备案号:黑ICP备15003705号© 2020-2023 www.taowenge.com 淘文阁