EVATraining-EVA最好的培训资料.ppt

上传人:赵** 文档编号:78664249 上传时间:2023-03-18 格式:PPT 页数:33 大小:1.50MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
EVATraining-EVA最好的培训资料.ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共33页
EVATraining-EVA最好的培训资料.ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共33页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《EVATraining-EVA最好的培训资料.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《EVATraining-EVA最好的培训资料.ppt(33页珍藏版)》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。

1、Introduction to EVA Management System 2021/9/261ContentsvWhat is EVA?vThe calculation of EVAvThe EVA management system2021/9/262ContentsvWhat is EVA?vThe calculation of EVAvThe EVA management system2021/9/263EVA is Earnings After the Cost of CapitalRevenues-Operating Costs-Depreciation-/+Adjustments

2、-Taxes=Operating Income After Tax(NOPAT)-Capital x c%Capital Charge=EVA Objective:Objective:Continuous Improvement in EVAContinuous Improvement in EVAP/LB/S2021/9/264The intrinsic value is the determinant of the market value in efficient capital marketIntrinsic Intrinsic Intrinsic valuevaluevalueFin

3、ancial Financial Financial measuresmeasuresmeasuresOperating Operating Operating metricsmetricsmetrics MVA,Stock price EVA ROI,Capital turnover,margin Market share,Unit cost,scrap rate,delivery timeCompetitive strategyBusiness modelManagement systemOperating efficiencyMarket Market Market valuevalue

4、value2021/9/265US as exampleUS as example50%40%30%20%10%Correlation with stock priceEVA ROE Cash Flow EPS RevenueAs a measure of business intrinsic value,EVA correlates with stock price better than other measures2021/9/266EVA measure gives more insights into the businessFrom Enrons 2000 Annual Repor

5、t(Letter to Shareholders):Enrons performance in 2000 was a success by any measureThe companys net income reached a record in 2000.Enron is laser-focused on earnings per share,and we expect to continue strong earnings performance.(in mil)Net IncEPSEVA(in mil)2021/9/267ContentsvWhat is EVA?vThe calcul

6、ation of EVAvThe EVA management system2021/9/268 9From the traditional accounting model to the economic model of the firmAccountingFrameworkEVAFrameworkAdjustmentsP&LBalance SheetCash Flow StatementNOPATCapitalEVAvSeparate financing effects from operating performancevExtend matching of costs with re

7、venue to economic basis vSeparate operating from non-operatingvEliminate book keeping entries/reserves that distort cash flow and reduce objectivitySo as tovTo better reflect value creationvTo motivate the right value-creating behavior 10Optimizing the EVA MeasurevMaterialityDifference in EVA with o

8、r without adjustment Is it material?Set a rule of thumb and use common sensevMotivationAdjustment must motivate managers to do the right thingStart with dysfunctional behaviors in standard operating proceduresvData AvailabilityCost of collecting information must be reasonablevSimplicityEVA is for op

9、erating people keep it simpleA fully adjusted EVA is too complicated to use and communicate 11The EVA Calculation Precision VariesBasic EVATailored EVATrue EVADisclosed EVA 12ADJUSTMENTSCash toEconomicNon-operatingItemsNon-recurringEventsAccrual toCashAccounting conservatism treats many investments

10、as current expenses (R&D,significant Marketing/Training-only those specifically relating to a“strategic”purpose)EVA views them as investments in the future Accounting misstates cash flow(Reserves)EVA seeks to emphasize actual cash eventsAccounting distorts ongoing operating performance(Restructuring

11、 and Asset sales)EVA treatment avoids profit peaks and troughsItems not included in the normal course of business,or not usually managed at unit level(Interest Expense from Debt;Other Financing)In the EVA framework,we must turn the accounting model into an economic model 13 Cost of Debt Cost of Capi

12、tal?%+Cost of Equity?%?%The cost of capital comprises both debt&equity costsRisk Free RateEquity Risk PremiumDebt Premium(Credit spread)14Cost ofEquity Capital(required return byequity holders)Risk()Risk-FreeRate RfMarket Risk PremiumMRP(Rm-Rf)Relationship between Risk and ReturnMarket Risk=1Cost of

13、 Equity=Rf +(Beta x MRP)A Beta value is required to determine cost of equity 15In general,a higher business risk implies higher beta value,hence higher cost of equity 16To calculate Beta,a list of peers need to be identified for ClientvA peer company is not necessarily a competitor,but rather a comp

14、any engaged in principally similar business subject to the same underlying economic forces.They may be competitors or companies in similar industries and business environments.vPeer comparisons are used to:Derive Betas for the respective business units and the corporation to facilitate cost of capit

15、al(COC)calculations.Non-listed companies,wholly-owned subsidiaries and business units do not have publicly traded shares from which to measure the levered Betas.Where possible,a pure-play analysis of publicly traded peer companies is used to estimate the unlevered Beta,or BRI.This is then translated

16、 into the levered Beta for that company,using the capital structure and the cost of debt.Benchmark EVA performance and identify value drivers.ContentsvWhat is EVA?vThe calculation of EVAvThe EVA management system2021/9/2617 18StrategyStrategyFormationFormationGoal SettingGoal SettingPlanning&Plannin

17、g&BudgetingBudgetingExecutionExecutionEvaluationEvaluationMotivationMotivationEVAEVAEVAEVAEVAValue Value BasedBasedManagementManagementEVA provides a comprehensive value management framework to translate strategy into action 20Goal setting and benchmarking 21In the EVA framework,Market Value can be

18、broken down into Future Growth Value and Current Operations Value CapitalPV of current EVA in perpetuityPV of EVA ImprovementMVA=Present Value of Current EVA+Present Value of Expected Improvements to Current EVAFuture Growth Value(FGV)CurrentOperationsValue(COV)MarketValueMarket Value Added(MVA)Capi

19、tal 22Future growth value represents an expectation of increase in EVAMarketValueCurrent OperationsValue(COV)Future Growth Value(FGV)Expected Improvementsin EVAqFuture Growth Value represents the premium on the value of current operations(Capital+EVA/c*).qThe presence of a Future Growth Value,which

20、equals PV of all future EVA improvements,signals the managers that owners/investors expect increases in EVA.qIncreases in EVA will also drive increases in MVA.As a result Investor Wealth will go up as well.23Applying“industry average growth expectations”to Clients 1999 EVA,we estimate an FGV of$691m

21、FGV 39%COV 61%1999 Client EVA1999 COV 1,069mFGV?vIf we know Clients 1999 COV is$1060m(COV=1999 capital+1999 EVA/WACC)then we can calculate FGV based on the industry average COV:FGV ratio of 69:31v1999 EVA could be considered an abnormally good year for Client,so applying an average EVA from 97-00(a

22、lower EVA),the FGV for Client would come out to$319MEstimated FGV(using 1999 EVA)FGV 691mConservativeClients Industry Ratio1999COV 1,069mCAPITAL526mEVA/C544mEstimated FGV(using avg.97-00 EVA)FGV 319m97-00COV 493m 24Taking Clients FGV of$691m,we convert it into implied annual Expected Improvements in

23、 EVA(EI)2000 COV$(18m)FGV$691m20012003200220042005.2010Expected Improvement(EI)$26 millionMarket Value$673MAssuming Client were to achieve this EVA growth over a 10 year period,annual EVA improvements would have to be$26 million a year.FGVEI(for 10 Years)Aggressive$691m$26m per yearConservative$319m

24、$12m per year 25To achieve EIs,management should first understand the current EVA by focusing on return on capitalMargin xTurnover=ROCScenario A 20%x0.75=15%Scenario B 5%x3.0=15%NOPATCapitalProfitMarginCapitalTurnoverXReturn Return on Capitalon CapitalNOPATSalesSalesCapitalXorDissecting the rateof r

25、eturn brings to lightthe trade-offs betweenprofit margin andcapital efficiency.=A company could achieve a 15%return by either:26A company can use ROC curves to understand and map out its strategy to improve returns 27Client 1999Client 2000Client peers use fundamentally different business strategies

26、to create value in the industry 28Total Operation Expense Margin0%20%40%60%80%100%120%BaltransEGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverage%of SalesNOPAT Margin-5%0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%BaltransEGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverage%of SalesVariable Expenses M

27、argin0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%EGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasFedexUPSAverage%of SalesFixed Expenses Margin0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%EGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasFedexUPSAverage%of SalesBenchmarking NOPAT margins give Client a sense of how it falls in terms of operatin

28、g efficiencyNote:Baltrans and CNF removed from Variable and Fixed Expense drivers analysis due to insufficient data 29Capital Charge Margin0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%BaltransEGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverage%of SalesNWC Capital Charge Margin0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%BaltransEGLExped

29、.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverage%of SalesFixed Assets Charge Margin0%5%10%15%20%25%BaltransEGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverage%of SalesOther Capital Charge Margin-2%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%BaltransEGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverage

30、%of SalesCapital benchmarking points to working capital and fixed assets as an opportunity for Client to drive EVA upwards 30Summary of Benchmarking study 1999 Data In Thousands of USD Company/ItemsBaltransEGLExped.Client 1999Client 2000 AirborneAtlasCNFFedexUPSAverageBest in ClassSales100%100%100%1

31、00%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%Var.Exp/Sales97%62%69%34%54%34%11%N/A14%8%17%8%Fixed Exp/SalesN/A16%23%45%45%58%59%94%79%78%74%16%Selling/Sales N/A15%1%1%1%2%0%N/A0%0%1%0%-Operation Expenses/Sales97%92%94%80%101%95%71%94%93%85%88%23%-Tax/Sales0%3%1%1%0%2%12%2%5%4%5%0%+Other Income/Sales2%1%0%0%0%

32、1%15%1%4%-6%3%15%=NOPAT Margin5%5%5%20%-1%4%32%5%7%5%7%NWC Charge/Sales1%1%1%6%6%0%5%0%0%1%1%0%Fixed Assets Charge/Sales1%0%1%2%3%3%21%2%4%5%7%2%Other Assets Charge/Sales0%1%0%-1%3%1%10%2%5%0%4%0%-Capital Charge/Sales3%3%2%8%12%5%36%4%9%6%12%=Net Margin2%2%3%11%-13%-1%-4%1%-2%-1%-5%x Sales172,127595

33、,1731,444,57519,53413,4183,140,226637,0815,592,81016,773,47027,052,000=EVA3,25912,63845,4452,240(1,726)(24,340)(22,405)68,874(361,190)(261,400)31Looking at best in class Margin and Turnover,we can chart the EVA of Client under different scenarios(B)Achieve Best in Class Turns(D)Achieve Best in Class

34、 ROC(A)Achieve Best in Class NOPAT Margin(C)Also Best in Class TurnsHistoryPeer BenchmarkClient ForecastClient 97-99Best In Class 97-99CompanyClient,Inc.2000-2005NOPAT Margin15.0%25.6%Atlas Air7.5%Capital Turnover 313.6%505.0%Expeditors266.1%Return on Capital45.2%45.2%Client,Inc.23.0%32Client Best I

35、n Class Analysis(86,325)138,666146,19056,438146,190(100,000)(50,000)050,000100,000150,000200,000Current EVAAchieve NOPATmargin of 25.6%Achieve Cap.T/O of5xAchieve ROC=45%EVA USD000sEVA improve by$224,991EVA improve by$142,763Is there Trade off between capital T/O and Nopat Margin?EVA improve by a fu

36、rther$7,524Using Clients 2000 EVA as an illustration,the largest EVA opportunity is from NOPAT margin improvement(A)(B)(C)(D)Client Best In Class Analysis,in Thousand DollarsCurrent EVAAchieve NOPAT MarginAchieve Capital TurnsAchieve NOPAT Margin&Capital TurnsAchieve Return on CapitalSales670,895670,895670,895670,895670,895NOPAT(4,080)171,829(4,080)171,82998,516Avg Capital426,138426,138132,846132,846218,018WACC19.3%19.3%19.3%19.3%19.3%EVA(86,325)138,666(29,720)146,19056,438 33The industry value-based strategy map indicates the markets approval of certain business strategies

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 教育专区 > 高考资料

本站为文档C TO C交易模式,本站只提供存储空间、用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。本站仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁网,我们立即给予删除!客服QQ:136780468 微信:18945177775 电话:18904686070

工信部备案号:黑ICP备15003705号© 2020-2023 www.taowenge.com 淘文阁