亚开行-建设城市穷人的复原力:系统性变革的建议(英)-2022.11-54正式版.docx

上传人:太** 文档编号:68013574 上传时间:2022-12-26 格式:DOCX 页数:63 大小:1.35MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
亚开行-建设城市穷人的复原力:系统性变革的建议(英)-2022.11-54正式版.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共63页
亚开行-建设城市穷人的复原力:系统性变革的建议(英)-2022.11-54正式版.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共63页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《亚开行-建设城市穷人的复原力:系统性变革的建议(英)-2022.11-54正式版.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《亚开行-建设城市穷人的复原力:系统性变革的建议(英)-2022.11-54正式版.docx(63页珍藏版)》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。

1、ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANKADBExecutive SummaryClimate change and disaster risk are increasing and while the impacts are already being felt globally, people living below or just above the poverty line in urban areas are highly vulnerable and at risk. Without action to address the structural inequalities

2、that are the underlying drivers of vulnerability and build resilience to climate change and disasters, there is a risk that the number of poor and near-poor households in urban areas in Asia will rise over time, increasing the vulnerability of entire urban and country systems.The action needed requi

3、res a change from the business-as-usual approaches to addressing risk, to new approaches that have an explicit focus on the urban poor and near poor, and that put the urban poor and near poor at the center of decision-making. Crucial to these new approaches is an explicit focus on the drivers of vul

4、nerability of the urban poor and near poor to climate change and disaster risk. The key to change is integrated action across specific policy areas that bridges households, neighborhoods, and cities, as well as sectors, and jurisdictional boundaries and that is complementary over time.National gover

5、nments in partnership with other stakeholders have a critical role in supporting urban areas leading the change to new approaches that have an explicit focus on the drivers of vulnerability and bring about systemic change. By changing their approach to six policy areas-urban planning and development

6、, social protection, housing, livelihoods, health, and integrated infrastructurefrom fragmented and siloed to integrated and coordinated through risk- informed and inclusive governance, and by making available finance at the household, neighborhood, and city levels, national governments can create a

7、n enabling environment for securing and sustaining resilience in individual urban areas, and for facilitating the innovation and partnerships necessary to scale up nationally.Several key openings or opportunities exist in each country and in each city to bring about systemic change. Households, neig

8、hborhoods, and cities are key openings or opportunities entry pointsfor national governments and urban local governments to begin investing in new approaches in ways that are integrated, complementary, and ultimately, transformational. Each of these three entry points is an opportunity to strategica

9、lly invest in creating or strengthening vertical linkages, by bridging household, neighborhood, and city levels, and horizontal linkages, by integrating policy areas.Associated with each entry point are several strategic interventions, each with an explicit focus on addressing the underlying drivers

10、 of vulnerability of urban poor and near-poor populations to climate change and disaster risk. While the entry points are common for all cities and countries, the opportunities for strategic intervention in each country will depend on the specific policy context and enabling environment; the level o

11、f climate and disaster risk; and existingBuilding Resilience of the Urban Poorinterventions in reducing risk and building the resilience of urban poor and near-poor populations, including the existing coping and adaptation strategies of the urban poor and near poor themselves.This document sets out

12、opportunities starting at the level of the household to strengthen adaptive social protection policies and programs in combination with livelihood programs using a whole-of- government approach. This is designed to help households manage residual risk when a shock occurs and strengthen financing for

13、 housing that is acceptable, aspirational, and affordable. This should be combined with robust planning, design, and maintenance to contribute to reducing exposure and vulnerability. This can improve access to essential services via integrated infrastructure designed to reduce risk and, during times

14、 of shock, function at a level acceptable to the community plus contribute to improving the health of urban poor and near-poor households.This document sets out opportunities starting at the level of the neighborhood to strengthen the planning, design, delivery, operations, and maintenance of commun

15、ity-led infrastructure一 including nature-based solutions. These opportunities aim to improve the health, productivity, and social inclusion of the urban poor and near poor, addressing underlying drivers of vulnerability and improving the capacity to adapt to changing shocks and stresses. They are al

16、so designed to strengthen livelihood-related interventions at the neighborhood level to increase resilience and at the same time address drivers of vulnerability.This document also sets out opportunities starting at the level of the city to strengthen urban planning so that it is risk-informed there

17、by reducing exposure and vulnerability; strengthen citywide early warning systems, providing early warning and improving recovery; network citywide infrastructure to enhance resilience to ensure continuous access to services during and after an event; and improve financial preparedness to ensure con

18、tinuous access to funds during and after an event.Finally, this document sets out opportunities for intervention to strengthen the enabling environment so that governance is capable, accountable, and responsive; urban and climate data are accurate and accessible; and urban and climate financing is d

19、irected to households, neighborhoods, cities, and urban municipalities to meet their different requirements and bridge between levels, and there is the capacity to manage and monitor the use of these finances.In summary, this document makes the case for systemic change, and provides a framework for

20、and pathway to change for propoor resilient urban development.The Case for a Change in Approach to Building the Resilience of the Urban PoorChapterBuilding Resilience of the Urban Poor1.1 The Need for ChangeUrban populations in Asia and the Pacific are increasing-from 375 million in 1970 to 1.84 bil

21、lion in 2017. This has resulted in an increase in urbanizationfrom around 20% to 46% (AfDB et al. 2019). Urban areas, specifically cities in most countries in Asia, contribute more than 80% of gross domestic product (ADB n.d.). These urban areas are complex systems. Climate and disaster risk is incr

22、easing. The impact of climate change and disasters on one part of the urban system can have a cascading and compounding impact on another. Urban populations living below or just above the poverty line in urban and rural areas are highly vulnerable and at risk. Within urban environments, the urban po

23、or and near poor are usually the most vulnerable to increasing risk due to higher exposure to hazards and a range of structural inequalities, not least income poverty and informality. Without action to address these structural inequalities along with reducing exposure and building climate resilience

24、, the Asia and Pacific region is likely to see an increase in its urban poor population, increasing the vulnerability of entire urban and country systems.Systemic change is needed to address the structural inequalities that are the drivers of vulnerability of urban poor and near-poor households to c

25、limate change and disaster risk and build resilience. Structural inequalities such as income poverty; gender norms; age; disability; health status; insecurity of land tenure; and informality of settlements, housing, and livelihoods reduce the ability of urban poor and near-poor households to resist,

26、 absorb, recover from, and reorganize in response to climate change and disaster events without threatening their socioeconomic advancement and development (ADB 2013). Existing strategies to cope with and adapt to climate change and reduce disaster risk1.1 The Need for ChangeUrban populations in Asi

27、a and the Pacific are increasing-from 375 million in 1970 to 1.84 billion in 2017. This has resulted in an increase in urbanizationfrom around 20% to 46% (AfDB et al. 2019). Urban areas, specifically cities in most countries in Asia, contribute more than 80% of gross domestic product (ADB n.d.). The

28、se urban areas are complex systems. Climate and disaster risk is increasing. The impact of climate change and disasters on one part of the urban system can have a cascading and compounding impact on another. Urban populations living below or just above the poverty line in urban and rural areas are h

29、ighly vulnerable and at risk. Within urban environments, the urban poor and near poor are usually the most vulnerable to increasing risk due to higher exposure to hazards and a range of structural inequalities, not least income poverty and informality. Without action to address these structural ineq

30、ualities along with reducing exposure and building climate resilience, the Asia and Pacific region is likely to see an increase in its urban poor population, increasing the vulnerability of entire urban and country systems.Systemic change is needed to address the structural inequalities that are the

31、 drivers of vulnerability of urban poor and near-poor households to climate change and disaster risk and build resilience. Structural inequalities such as income poverty; gender norms; age; disability; health status; insecurity of land tenure; and informality of settlements, housing, and livelihoods

32、 reduce the ability of urban poor and near-poor households to resist, absorb, recover from, and reorganize in response to climate change and disaster events without threatening their socioeconomic advancement and development (ADB 2013). Existing strategies to cope with and adapt to climate change an

33、d reduce disaster riskResilience is defined as “the ability of countries, communities, businesses, and individual households to resist, absorb, recover from, and reorganize in response to natural hazard events, without jeopardizing their sustained socioeconomic advancement and development.Source: AD

34、B. 2013. Investing in Resilience: Ensuring a Disaster-Resistant Future. Manila.ensure short-term survival and address the immediate causes of vulnerability, but do not typically enable transformation by targeting the structural inequalities that are the underlying drivers of vulnerability. Strategie

35、s that target structural inequalities are needed to complement existing coping and adaptive measures if national and urban local governments are to reduce the vulnerability of urban poor and near-poor households and enable their advancement and development (Figure 1).To bring about systemic change a

36、nd transform the lives of the urban poor and near poor so they are more resilient, new approaches are needed to bridge existing policy silos and overcome policy fragmentation. These new approaches include improving governance and removing institutional impediments to taking an integrated and coordin

37、ated approach to urban planning and development.The Case for a Change in Approach to Building the Resilience of the Urban PoorFigure 1: A Continuum of Adaptation Strategies三 q9 n sssnE。oos(DsnB。 lpExo-d-BAJns lu-TtrousNew approaches that improve the delivery of social protection, support of liveliho

38、ods, and delivery of health services, as well as address the exposure and vulnerability of informal settlements and housing and integrate community-led infrastructure into city-level systems are needed. Gaps need to be 川led in data on hazards, and their likelyimpacts, as well as data on the underlyi

39、ng drivers of vulnerability to climate change and disaster risk. Gaps also need to be filled in the availability and allocation of funding and all levels of governments need to be strengthened so they are capable, accountable, and responsive.ResilienceRecovery, constancy, resistance, stabilitylearni

40、ng, experimentation, transformabilitySource: ADB. 2020. Advancing Inclusive and Resilient Urban Development Targeted at the Urban Poor: Pro-poor Climate Change Adaptation for Urban Areas. Consultanfs report. Manila (TA 9513-REG).Building Resilience of the Urban Poor1.2AFramework for ChangeTo achieve

41、 systemic change, national governments need to strengthen the way they currently enable action in urban areas to build resilience by engaging with urban poor communities, undertaking risk-informed urban planning, and delivering adaptive social protection. They should support resilient livelihoods, d

42、eliver health services, address the exposure and vulnerability of housing and shelter, plus ensure the integration ofcom munity-ledinfrastructurein citylevel systems.Systemic change requires focusing on six policy areas that deliver benefits at three different levelshousehold, neighborhood, and city

43、 with complementary actions that address the root causes of socioeconomic and ecological vulnerability to climate and disaster risk. Systemic change is underpinned by a supportive environment featuring a capable, accountable, and responsive government; accurate and accessible urban and climate data;

44、 and urban and climate finance directed to households, neighborhoods, cities and urban municipalities.1.2.1 Six Policy Areas for ChangeThe framework for change identifies six policy areas for integration at the household, neighborhood, and city levels over time if impact is to be maximized and susta

45、ined (Figure 2).Adaptive social protection is needed to transform the social and economic drivers that keep urban poor and near-poor households poor and vulnerable to climate change and disaster risk. Social protection designed with adaptive features is needed to enable urban poor and near-poor hous

46、eholds to prepare for and withstand covariate shocks by protecting1.2AFramework for ChangeTo achieve systemic change, national governments need to strengthen the way they currently enable action in urban areas to build resilience by engaging with urban poor communities, undertaking risk-informed urb

47、an planning, and delivering adaptive social protection. They should support resilient livelihoods, deliver health services, address the exposure and vulnerability of housing and shelter, plus ensure the integration ofcom munity-ledinfrastructurein citylevel systems.Systemic change requires focusing

48、on six policy areas that deliver benefits at three different levelshousehold, neighborhood, and city with complementary actions that address the root causes of socioeconomic and ecological vulnerability to climate and disaster risk. Systemic change is underpinned by a supportive environment featurin

49、g a capable, accountable, and responsive government; accurate and accessible urban and climate data; and urban and climate finance directed to households, neighborhoods, cities and urban municipalities.1.2.2 Six Policy Areas for ChangeThe framework for change identifies six policy areas for integration at the household, neighborhood, and city levels over time if impact is to be maximize

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 应用文书 > 解决方案

本站为文档C TO C交易模式,本站只提供存储空间、用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。本站仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁网,我们立即给予删除!客服QQ:136780468 微信:18945177775 电话:18904686070

工信部备案号:黑ICP备15003705号© 2020-2023 www.taowenge.com 淘文阁