《住所（营业场所）使用证明【管理及销售】.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《住所（营业场所）使用证明【管理及销售】.doc（3页珍藏版）》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。
1、住所营业场所使用证明企业名称住所营业场所使用情况地址邮政编码电话用途使用面积(平方米)产权归属使用关系使用期限谨此确认，以上内容不含虚假成份申请人签字日 期附注(1) “使用关系系指自有，租赁(2) “使用期限不得少于一年(3) 另附产权证或能证明产权归属的有效文件。如系租赁房屋，那么除提交产权证或能证明产权归属的有效文件外，还应提交租赁协议书或合同。(4) 租赁协议书或合同应是使用人直接与房屋产权所有人签订Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face because it was the federal circ
2、uit itself that introduced such patents with is 1998 decision in the so-called state Street Bank case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by emerging internet companies trying to stake out exclusiv
3、e pinhts to specific types of online transactions. Later, move established companies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might bent them to the punch. In 2005, IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method pate
4、nts despite tha fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly, some Wall Street investment films armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hed
5、ging risk in the energy market. The Federal circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the courts judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluste is wether it should “reconsider its state street Bank ruling.The Federal Circ
6、uits action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the supreme. Count that has nurrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for “inventions that are obvious. The judges on the Federal circuit
7、 are “reaction to the anti_patent trend at the supreme court says Harole C wegner, a partend In his book The Tipping Poinl Malcohn aladuell aloues that social epidemics are dliven in largepart by the acting of a tiny minority of special individuals,often calledin flu entials who are unusuall informe
8、d, persuasive, or we connect The idea is intuit ively compelling but it doesnt explain howideas actually spread.The supposed importance of inftuentials derives from a plansible sounding but largely untested theory untested thelry called the tow-step flow of communication Informationllows from the me
9、diato the inftuentials and from then to ereryone else. Marke ters have embraced the two-step flow became it suggests that if they can just find andinfluence the in fluent ials, those select people will do most of the work for them Thetheory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity
10、of people waswearing promoting or developing whaterver it is before anyone else paid attention Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the idea that only certain specialIn their recent work howeyer some researchers have come up with the finding that in fluentials have far less impact on soc
11、ial epidemics than is genetally supposed InThe researchers argument stems from a simple obserrating about social influence with the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey-whose outsize presence is primanrilly a function of media not interpersonal influence-enen the most influential member
12、s of a population simply dont interact with that many others Yet it is precisely these non-celebring influentials who according to the two-step-flow theoryare supposed to drive social enidemics by influcenciny their friends and colleagues directly .For a social epidemic to occur however each person
13、so sffected must then influcence his or her own acquaintances,who must in turn influence theirs and so on and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential.If people in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove
14、resistant for example from the initial influential prove resistant, for example the casecade of change wont propagate very far or affect many people.Bankers have been blaming themselves for their troubles in public .Behind eht scenes,they have been taking aim at someone else the accounting standard-
15、setters.Their rules,moan the banks,have forced them to report enormous losses,and its just not fair.These rules say they must value some assets at the price atheird party would pay,not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch.Unfortunately,bankslobbying now seems to be working.The
16、details may be unknowable,but the independence of standard-setters,essential to the proper functioning of capital marksts,is being compromised.And,unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers,reviving the banking system will be difficult.After a bruising encounter with Xongress.Amer
17、ica;s Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB)rushed through rule changse.These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long0term assets in their income statement.Bob Herz,the FASBs chairman,cried out against ehose who question o
18、ur motives.Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhance what one lobby group politely callsthe use of judgment by European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board(IASB)do likewise.The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning,but the pressure t
19、o fold when it comletes it reconstruction of rules later this year is strong Charlie McCreevy,a European commissioner,warned the IASB that is didnot live in a political vacuumbutin the real word and the Europe could It was banks that were on the wrong planet,with accouts htat wastly overvalued asset
20、s.today they argue htat market prices overstate loeees,because hteyLargerly reflect the temporary illiquldity of markets,not the likely entent of bad debts.The truth will not be known for years.But banks shares trade below their book value,suggeting that investors are akeptical.And dead markets part
21、ly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses,yet are relucaant to buy all those supposed bargains.To get the sysytem working again, losses must be recognized and dealt with.Americas new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless banks mark assets to l
22、evels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that,cleaning up rules on stock options ang pensions,for example,against hostility interests. But by giving in to critics now they are inviting pressure
23、 to make more concessions.在供货商方面，我们通常希望的是可以强化对卖方(供货商)的谈判力，这是因传统上买方(采购者)与卖方(供货商)之间的关系往往是相互冲突的，而在选择供货商时往往也是一次价格的拉锯战。但近年来企业间的竞争逐渐转型为全球化，讲求快速反响消费者的需求。所以在供给链管理的概念下，供货商与采购者的关系不再敌对，相反的两者必须培养出良好的默契，利用将彼此所收集之数据做完整而快速的交流，才可开展出比其它同业更快的反响速度，充分满足消费者的需求，以便在这波竞争中生存下来。企业在选择供货商时，假设选择到良好供货商对企业的成长是一个助力，反之，假设选择到不良的供货商那
24、么就如同挥之不去的梦魇，轻那么延误交期造成不便，重那么影飨公司营运，造成商誉及财务的严重损失。因此选择一个良好的供货商，对企业而言是十分重要的。然而怎样选择适当的供货商，是许多企业中采购部门最感头痛的问题，一个良好的供货商，其所供给的物料或效劳应有适当的质量、应有合理的价格、应在适当的时间送达、还应提供适当的效劳，以满足客户之需求；正因供货商的地位重要，所以一般公司均有一套评估供货商绩效的方法，此方法是指与公司有往来之供货商，为期建来制度、确保可靠的供给来源，而对与各供货商交易之记录来予以考核，以评定其优劣等级，而作为公司选择采购对象的一个依据。供给链管理在今日是一个很热门的话题 ，而供给链要
25、做的好，第一要务便是要做好供货商评估与选择，因为唯有适合的供货商与之配合，才能有双赢的合伙关系，也才能快速的反响消费者需求。在供货商方面，我们通常希望的是可以强化对卖方(供货商)的谈判力，这是因传统上买方(采购者)与卖方(供货商)之间的关系往往是相互冲突的，而在选择供货商时往往也是一次价格的拉锯战。但近年来企业间的竞争逐渐转型为全球化，讲求快速反响消费者的需求。所以在供给链管理的概念下，供货商与采购者的关系不再敌对，相反的两者必须培养出良好的默契，利用将彼此所收集之数据做完整而快速的交流，才可开展出比其它同业更快的反响速度，充分满足消费者的需求，以便在这波竞争中生存下来。企业在选择供货商时，假
26、设选择到良好供货商对企业的成长是一个助力，反之，假设选择到不良的供货商那么就如同挥之不去的梦魇，轻那么延误交期造成不便，重那么影飨公司营运，造成商誉及财务的严重损失。因此选择一个良好的供货商，对企业而言是十分重要的。然而怎样选择适当的供货商，是许多企业中采购部门最感头痛的问题，一个良好的供货商，其所供给的物料或效劳应有适当的质量、应有合理的价格、应在适当的时间送达、还应提供适当的效劳，以满足客户之需求；正因供货商的地位重要，所以一般公司均有一套评估供货商绩效的方法，此方法是指与公司有往来之供货商，为期建来制度、确保可靠的供给来源，而对与各供给链管理在今日是一个很热门的话题 ，而供给链要做的好，第一要务便是要做好供货商评估与选择，因为唯有适合的供货商与之配合，才能有双赢的合伙关系，也才能快速的反响消费者需求。