《注塑模具设计技术毕业论文中英文资料对照外文翻译文献.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《注塑模具设计技术毕业论文中英文资料对照外文翻译文献.docx（9页珍藏版）》请在taowenge.com淘文阁网|工程机械CAD图纸|机械工程制图|CAD装配图下载|SolidWorks_CaTia_CAD_UG_PROE_设计图分享下载上搜索。
1、注塑模具设计技术毕业论文中英文资料对照外文翻译文献 注塑模具设计技术 中英文资料对照外文翻译文献 附录：英文 Design and Technology of the Injection Mold 1、3D solid model to replace the center layer model The traditional injection molding simulation software based on products of the center layer model. The user must first be thin-walled plastic products
2、 abstract into approximate plane and curved surface, the surface is called the center layer. In the center layer to generate two-dimensional planar triangular meshes, the use of these two-dimensional triangular mesh finite element method, and the final result of the analysis in the surface display.
3、Injection product model using3D solid model, the two models are inconsistent, two modeling inevitable. But because of injection molding product shape is complex and diverse, the myriads of changes from a three-dimensional entity, abstraction of the center layer is a very difficult job, extraction pr
4、ocess is very cumbersome and time-consuming, so the design of simulation software have fear of difficulty, it has become widely used in injection molding simulation software the bottleneck. HSCAE3D is largely accepted3D solid / surface model of the STL file format. Now the mainstream CAD/CAM system,
5、 such as UG, Pro/ENGINEER, CATIA and SolidWorks, can output high quality STL format file. That is to say, the user can use any commercial CAD/CAE systems to generate the desired products3D geometric model of the STL format file, HSCAE3D can automatically add the STL file into a finite element mesh m
6、odel, through the surface matching and introduction of a new boundary conditions to ensure coordination of corresponding surface flow, based on3D solid model of analysis, and display of three-dimensional analysis results, replacing the center layer simulation technology to abstract the center layer,
7、 and then generate mesh this complicated steps, broke through system simulation application bottlenecks, greatly reducing the burden of user modeling, reduces the technical requirement of the user, the user training time from the past few weeks shorter for a few hours. Figure 1 is based on the centr
8、al layer model and surface model based on 3D solid / flow analysis simulation comparison chart. 2、Finite element, finite difference, the control volume methods Injection molding products are thin products, products in the thickness direction of size is much smaller than the other two dimensions, tem
9、perature and other physical quantities in the thickness direction of the change is very large, if the use of a simple finite element and finite difference method will cause analysis time is too long, can not meet the actual needs of mold design and manufacturing. We in the flow plane by using finite
10、 element method, the thickness direction by using finite difference method, were established and plane flow and thickness directions corresponding to the size of the grid and coupling, while the accuracy is guaranteed under the premise of the calculation speed to meet the need of engineering applica
11、tion, and using the control volume method is solved. The moving boundary problem in. For internal and external correspondence surface differences between products, can be divided into two parts the volume, and respectively formed the control equation, the junction of interpolation to ensure that the
12、 two part harmony contrast. 3、Numerical analysis and artificial intelligence technology Optimization of injection molding process parameters has been overwhelming majority of mold design staff concerns, the traditional CAE software while in computer simulation of a designated under the conditions of
13、 the injection molding conditions, but is unable to automatically optimize the technical parameters. Using CAE software personnel must be set to different process conditions were multiple CAE analysis, combined with practical experience in the program were compared between, can get satisfactory proc
14、ess scheme. At the same time, the parts after the CAE analysis, the system will generate a large amount of information about the project ( product, process, analyzes the results ), which often results in a variety of data form, requiring the user to have the analysis and understanding of the results
15、 of CAE analysis ability, so the traditional CAE software is a kind of passive computational tools, can provide users with intuitionistic, effective engineering conclusion, to software users demand is too high, the influence of CAE system in the larger scope of application and popularization. In vie
16、w of the above, HSCAE3D software in the original CAE system based on accurate calculation function, the knowledge engineering technology is introduced the system development, the use of artificial intelligence is the ability of thinking and reasoning, instead of the user to complete a large number o
17、f information analysis and processing work, directly provide guiding significance for the process of conclusions and recommendations, effectively solve the CAE of the complexity of the system and the requirements of the users of the contradiction between, shortening of the CAE system and the distanc
18、e between the user, the simulation software by traditional passive computational tools to active optimization system. HSCAE3D system artificial intelligence technology will be applied to the initial design, the results of the analysis of CAE interpretation and evaluation, improvement and optimizatio
19、n analysis of3 aspects. 附录：中文翻译 注塑模具设计的技术 1用三维实体模型取代中心层模型 传统的注塑成形仿真软件基于制品的中心层模型。用户首先要将薄壁塑料制品抽象成近似的平面和曲面，这些面被称为中心层。在这些中心层上生成二维平面三角网格，利用这些二维平面三角网格进行有限元计算，并将最终的分析结果在中面上显示。而注塑产品模型多采用三维实体模型，由于两者模型的不一致，二次建模不可避免。但由于注塑产品的形状复杂多样、千变万化，从三维实体中抽象出中心层面是一件十分困难的工作，提取过程非常繁琐费时，因此设计人员对仿真软件有畏难情绪，这已成为注塑成形仿真软件推广应用的瓶颈。 HS
20、CAE 3D主要是接受三维实体/表面模型的STL文件格式。现在主流的CAD/CAM 系统，如UG、Pro/ENGINEER、 CATIA和SolidWorks等，均可输出质量较高的STL格式文件。这就是说，用户可借助任何商品化的CAD/CAE系统生成所需制品的三维几何模型的STL格式文件，HSCAE 3D可以自动将该STL文件转化为有限元网格模型，通过表面配对和引入新的边界条件保证对应表面的协调流动，实现基于三维实体模型的分析，并显示三维分析结果，免去了中心层模拟技术中先抽象出中心层，再生成网格这一复杂步骤，突破了仿真系统推广应用的瓶颈，大大减轻了用户建模的负担，降低了对用户的技术要求，对用户
21、的培训时间也由过去的数周缩短为几小时。图1为基于中心层模型和基于三维实体/表面模型流动分析模拟情况对比图。 2有限元、有限差分、控制体积方法的综合运用 注塑制品都是薄壁制品，制品厚度方向的尺寸远小于其他两个方向的尺寸，温度等物理量在厚度方向的变化又非常大，若采用单纯的有限元或有限差分方法势必造成分析时间过长，无法满足模具设计与制造的实际需要。我们在流动平面采用有限元法，厚度方向采用有限差分法，分别建立与流动平面和厚度方向尺寸相适应的网格并进行耦合求解，在保证计算精度的前提下使得计算速度满足工程的需要，并采用控制体积法解决了成形中的移动边界问题。对于内外对应表面存在差异的制品，可划分为两部分体积
22、，并各自形成控制方程，通过在交接处进行插值对比保证这两部分的协调。 3数值计算与人工智能技术的结合 优选注塑成形工艺参数一直是广大模具设计人员关注的问题，传统的CAE软件虽然可以在计算机上仿真出指定工艺条件下的注塑成形情况，但无法自动对工艺参数进行优化。CAE软件使用人员必须设置不同的工艺条件进行多次CAE分析，并结合实际经验在各方案之间进行比较，才能得出较满意的工艺方案。同时，在对零件进行CAE分析后，系统会产生有关该方案的大量信息(制品、工艺条件、分析结果等)，其中分析结果往往以各种数据场的形式出现，要求用户必须具备分析和理解CAE分析结果的能力，所以传统的CAE软件是一种被动式的计算工具
23、，无法提供给用户直观、有效的工程化结论，对软件使用者的要求过高，影响了CAE系统在更大范围内的应用和普及。针对以上不足，HSCAE 3D软件在原有CAE系统准确的计算功能基础上，把知识工程技术引入系统的开发中，利用人工智能所具有的思维和推理能力，代替用户完成大量信息的分析和处理工作，直接提供具有指导意义的工艺结论和建议，有效解决了CAE系统的复杂性与用户使用要求的简单性之间的矛盾，缩短了CAE系统与用户之间的距离，将仿真软件由传统的“被动式”计算工具提升为“主动式”优化系统。HSCAE 3D系统主要将人工智能技术应用于初始工艺方案设计、CAE分析结果的解释和评价、分析方案的改进与优化3个方面。